More scary stuff: indoctination

So it seems like every time I read anything about the government these days, it's one abject failure after another. Whether it's bailouts, handouts, encroaching socialism, corruption revelations, or other malignancy, each day brings new reasons to feel disgusted with your "representatives" in the Obamanation. However, every once in a while they plumb a new low, and indoctrinating school children could just be the new bar-setter for utterly despicable actions which bring my hatred for Obama and the misguided people who elected him (and/or the few remaining zealots who still support him) to entirely new levels.

Maybe I'm over-reacting. I mean, surely the Obamanation is doing more destructive things to the United States in general than force-feeding liberal propaganda to impressionable school children. Destruction of the national currency has got to be worth more overall "evil points" than brainwashing poor Richard and Jane. Achieving the end-goal of full Socialism will probably have worse long-term on our children than one day of indoctrination. Reversing the damage Obama is reeking on our economy will surely take longer than teaching the very important lesson that people, especially politicians, lie a lot.

Yet, for some reason, using your position to brainwash children with your propaganda seems worse than all those things. For me, it's kinda the ultimate low, worse than virtually any other damage you can do. Not that I needed another reason to think Obama was bad for the country, but this moves him from irresponsible and misguided to straight-up evil.

Comments

  1. CJSeptember 2, 2009 at 9:04 PM

    The thing I saw was non-partisan, but it suggested people should always go along with the president. That can backfire if we get a right-wing president. I am absolutely against telling kids they should go along with the gov't. I'm just saying the release I saw did not say only to go along with a liberal president. They could easily take those values and support any president. Kids should be taught to question the gov't and politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Left Coast RebelSeptember 3, 2009 at 4:37 PM

    Nick - I agree with CJ above,(of course), in that this is prepostorous at best, perhaps criminal. I don't think you are over-reacting.Did you see at LCR how I just simply inserted 'Dear Leader' into a section of the outline give to teachers and schools? Did you not that it was the perfect template for a Kim Jong Il type government?

    Wake up people!

    ReplyDelete
  3. NickSeptember 3, 2009 at 5:07 PM

    LCR: I did see that, and it seemed very fitting.

    It's crap like this which not only makes me want to resolve to never send my [eventual] kids to public school, but also undermines the entire concept of a state-run education system. Like most government programs, it seems good in theory, and might work in a fantasy world where corruption and malfeasance of politicians didn't exist, but in the real world the downsides outweigh the benefits.

    CJ: Agree, emphatically. The appropriate and factual message, if anything, is that the government is there to screw you, always, and you should do everything possible to oppose it; anything else is a lie in the modern political reality. The US was founded on the principle of government as a necessary evil, and we the people are currently losing the struggle against domestic tyranny.

    ReplyDelete
  4. LarrySeptember 6, 2009 at 6:36 AM

    Yeah, study hard and go to school is really a subversive message. Who knows, maybe next week he'll be telling school children to eat their vegetables.

    ReplyDelete
  5. NickSeptember 8, 2009 at 12:03 PM

    Not objecting to the principle because you don't object to the specific context is like not complaining when the government ships your neighbor off to Guantanamo forever, because it didn't happen to you: if you don't oppose the principle, there will be nobody left to oppose the actions when the government comes for you. Obama's speech may have been benign in this particular case, but I'm with CJ: if anything, we should be teaching children to not trust the government, not the other way around.

    Anyway, I would suggest that supporters of Obama's sit-downs with our children keep that in mind the next time a religious leader wants to have a sit-down with your kids, and explain why mommy and daddy might be going to hell...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I Hate Obama-speak

Every time Obama speaks, it aggravates me. It's not because of his method of speaking or speech itself: he's a great public speaker who's clear, eloquent, and polished. It's also not because he uses a teleprompter obsessively, is very good at not straying from whatever canned message or pitch has been written for him, and dodges answering any probing questions with real information: most politicians have perfected these arts, and they have become so ingrained in our political process that they are as expected as they are unhelpful in conveying actual information. It's obviously also not because he lies: most politicians lie, usually very well, and Obama can state even laughable, preposterous fallacies without even breaking stride, but again, that's expected, normal, and uniform in today's politicians. No, none of these things are the reason Obama's speeches really get to me. See, Obama comes across as a smart guy, and every once in a while you get a semi...
Read more

If there was going to be a public health care plan...

I realize a public health care plan is a bad idea, but it did get me thinking: if I were making the bill, and everyone else strongly wanted a public plan, is there a form of the plan which I would be agreeable to? I thought about it, and I think a public plan would be eminently workable, provided it has some simple immutable provisions. Now, I don't think the Democrats are going to put anything like this into their disaster of a plan, much less be capable of adhering to all the requirements, but I would venture to say that if they truly wanted bipartisan support, this would be one way to get it; I strongly suspect most Republicans would back a public plan with my simple provisions. Without further ado, the provisions: - All public employees will be covered by the same public plan with the same benefits, from every level of government from janitors to the President. This will ensure that the plan is good, provides reasonable coverage, and Congress has a strong incentive to get it ri...
Read more

Why the housing market decline is far from over

Image
This chart shows the recast dates for various loans over the next five years, based on the current rate of negative amortization (copied from CalculatedRisk ). I think it would be fair to assume that most of these are going to be defaults, as soon as (or slightly after) the recast time; almost everyone who can afford their house is either already in a fixed-rate mortgage (and thus not appearing on this chart). This virtual tidal-wave of defaults represents roughly $25,000,000,000 worth of housing inventory being added to the market, per month, for the next five years . For reference, the NAR's latest statistics indicate there are only about $66B in sales of existing homes, per month, total, in the whole US. That lines up pretty well with the latest estimations of total home sales which are foreclosures, which is around 45% (REO's are selling slightly better than non-REO's, cause they are more realistically priced). Most people agree that the housing market is not likely to...
Read more